|
Responsible citizenship
|
How are the needs of groups met?
How do democratic processes consider different views?
Why do people contribute to the community?
|
What are the benefits to society of groups participating in communities?
How can the merits of different democratic processes be assessed?
How can citizen action and particular community involvement be evaluated?
|
How can young people contribute to quality of life as active citizens?
How can the use of particular strategies by groups and governments in effecting global change be evaluated?
How can the effectiveness of citizen action and participation in democracy be evaluated?
|
|
Historical inquiry
|
What are some different types of evidence and sources of information about the past?
What are primary and secondary sources and how are they used?
How can the reliability of information about the past be checked?
|
How can historical fact and opinion be distinguished?
How can different perspectives and versions of these events be compared?
How can conflicting information be assessed for credibility and authenticity?
How can history be viewed from multiple perspectives and what are the implications of this for the future?
|
How are multiple evidences used to reach considered views?
How can historical interpretations be evaluated?
What motivations are behind presenting particular viewpoints about the past?
How can information be tested for veracity?
What are the multiple effects of, and reasons for, actions of groups and individuals in history?
|
|
Philosophical inquiry
|
What challenging questions could be asked to assess usefulness of information?
How can logic and supporting evidence in arguments be assessed?
How can other perspectives and reasons behind them be assessed before drawing conclusions?
|
How can information be assessed for validity, authenticity and credibility?
What different ethical positions can be held?
How can judgements be assessed as being fair or unfair?
What is the basis for forming and modifying conclusions?
What assertions, bias and assumptions need to be considered?
|
How can complex and controversial issues and choices be analysed?
Valid, justifiable and tentative conclusions
How can fair-mindedness be maintained in personal values and beliefs?
How can diverse ethical viewpoints and dilemmas be analysed and evaluated?
How can personal positions be reached fairly as well as be evaluated and revised?
|
|
Communication
|
What are some different ways of representing information?
How can information be checked for relevance and accuracy?
What differences and similarities are there in information about the same topic?
How can information in a communication product be organised and structured?
|
What different viewpoints and bias are contained in this information?
How can information be authenticated?
How can information be interpreted and synthesised?
How can arguments in communication products be logically sequenced?
|
How is information designed to be persuasive?
How are value positions and prejudice advanced in information?
How can communication products be created to be persuasive yet free from prejudice?
How can communication products be created to be compelling and convincing?
|